Home
Presents
Clinical Ferenczi
Exploring Ferenczi’s Clinical Legacy and its Applications to Contemporary Therapeutic Work
A Clinical/Theory Seminar with Anthony Bass, Ph.D.
CE Credits (16.5 hours) available for
New York Psychologists, Social Workers, and MHCs
APA CE credits available for Psychologists
Participants must attend all 10 seminar meetings in their entirety to receive CE credits.
For students and practitioners of all levels
This seminar will explore the clinical legacy of Sándor Ferenczi through readings of his work and the work of others who followed in the spirit of his findings on trauma; dissociation; mutuality; the uses of countertransference; and the intersubjective approach and sensibility. We will consider and explore clinical moments from an interpersonal/relational/intersubjective perspective that have been profoundly influenced by Ferenczi’s theories. Readings will include texts by Ferenczi, Balint, E. Severn, Frankel, Rudnytsky, Harris, Mitchell, Bromberg, Ghent, Stern, Aron, Black, Davies, Benjamin, Slochower, and Bass, among others. We will consider Ferenczi and others’ contributions to the development of theory and technique in light of challenging clinical moments that seminar members and the seminar leader will present.
This series is an extension of a previous seminar, “Reading the Clinical Diary and Other Works,” at the Sándor Ferenczi Center. New members of the group are welcome, with the understanding that those who join should be familiar with The Clinical Diary of Sándor Ferenczi and his groundbreaking paper, “The Confusion of Tongues Between Adults and the Child – The Language of Tenderness and of Passion,” as points of departure for our clinical and theoretical discussions.
* * *
Learning Objectives
At the end of the workshop, participants will be able to:
- List the ways in which Ferenczi’s late work has exercised a central role in the development of relational and intersubjective theory and technique of psychoanalysis.
- Identify Ferenczi’s influence on contemporary views of dissociation and multiplicity.
- Describe how Ferenczi’s work contributed to an understanding of the therapeutic relationship from a relational point of view.
- Discuss the impact of Ferenczi’s work on our understanding of unconscious communication and its relevance to psychoanalytic technique.
- Describe how Ferenczi’s work contributed to our understanding of the role of self-disclosure in psychoanalytic technique.
- Compare differences between self-disclosure, self-revelation and state sharing in psychoanalytic therapy, and the different uses of them in the clinical encounter.
- Explain why state-sharing is useful in a dissociative model of the mind.
- Describe the ways in which aspects of Ferenczi’s findings regarding mutual analysis are relevant to contemporary applications of intersubjectivity theories.
- Explain the ways in which Bromberg’s self state theory and multiple self state model is used clinically in contemporary work.
- Assess the ways in which enactment can be used therapeutically in relational analytic work.
- Explain the meaning of Balint’s concept of the “basic fault” and its relevance to clinical practice.
- Describe what Ferenczi meant by a dialogue of unconsciouses and its relevance to the “uncanny.”
- Describe the difference between “submission” and “surrender” in Ghent’s work on Masochism.
- Explain the difference between implicit and expressive uses of countertransference in Bollas’ work.
Anthony Bass, Ph.D. is an associate professor and clinical consultant for the NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy and is on the faculty and a training and supervising analyst at the Columbia University Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research. He was a founding editor, and, for 12 years, the editor-in-chief of Psychoanalytic Dialogues, where he continues to serve as editor emeritus. He was a founding director of IARPP and the Stephen Mitchell Relational Study Center, where he now serves as President. He is on the Board of Directors of the Sándor Ferenczi Center at The New School for Social Research. He is in practice for psychoanalysis, couples therapy, and clinical supervisory consultation in New York City and leads clinical seminars and workshops on the therapy relationship and Ferenczi studies around the world.
Participants with physical or sensory disabilities are encouraged to contact the CE committee members at least 2 weeks in advance of the event to plan for appropriate accommodations. Please contact us via phone or email:
Nichelle Horlacher, Department Secretary: T 212.229.5727 x3223
Miriam Steele, Ph.D. steelem@newschool.edu
Howard Steele, Ph.D. steeleh@newschool.edu
Netta Keesom, MA, Student Coordinator. NSSRFerencziCenter@gmail.com
Participants may also contact CE committee members with any concerns. You may also share concerns when you receive your evaluation form after the event.
Tickets may be refunded up to 24 hours prior to the start of the event.
Please email NSSRFerencziCenter@gmail.com to cancel your ticket and request a refund.
The New School for Social Research, Department of Psychology SW CPE is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers #0199.
The New School for Social Research, Department of Psychology is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Mental Health Practitioners as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed mental health counselors. #MHC-0120.
The New School of Social Research, Department of Psychology is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Psychology as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed psychologists #PSY-0146.
The New School for Social Research, Department of Psychology is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists.
The New School for Social Research Clinical Psychology Department maintains responsibility for this program and its content.
The sponsors of this event report no conflicts of interest or commercial support.
Lewis Aron (1952-2019)
Written by Adrienne Harris
On Thursday, February 28, 2019, our dear colleague and friend and leader and brave man, Lewis Aron, died in New York City. It was the end we had all feared and mostly denied, as we accompanied Lew on a long and courageous voyage fighting and living with a life-threatening cancer.
There is so much to say about Lew’s life and work but I want to begin with his way of combatting and living with his illness. He was brave but most powerfully he was generous with family, friends and colleagues. He has provided an amazing lesson in how to be open and available and at the same time continue to work for health and survival. We badly need, in our field, to be able to face difficulty, support each other as life and work patterns are put in question, and to create a climate of honesty and responsibility.
Yesterday I taught a class in which we were reading Ghent’s great paper on submission and surrender. I feel such admiration and love for Lew as he went through the health circumstance and death he had been handed. Surrender is not giving up. It is acceptance. It is opening to experience and what it will teach you.
When I think of his work life and when I read the wonderful messages of love and admiration, I am struck by the mixture of pleasure and admiration in so many reminiscences. He had a rock band. Sig. He could build and maintain a serious psychoanalytic institution. He could work in systems – local and national. He built structures.
Our work together included the Ferenczi Conferences starting in 1991, the Sandor Ferenczi Center beginning in 2008 with Jeremy Safran and me, the Relational Perspectives Book Series, with Steve from the inception, later with me, and adding Steve Kuchuck and Eyal Rozmarin. That series is closing in on 100 volumes.
The work we did to bring the first conference on Sandor Ferenczi to the US was motivated – dictated one might say – by Steve Mitchell. Cannot speak for Lew but I had no idea who Ferenczi was. Steve was so amazingly good at empowering people, sending them on various errands, and so we did a conference – held in NYC – and sat in the audience, amazed at the European analysts, who in so many ways had kept the tradition and writings and work of Ferenczi alive. Judit Mészarós, André Haynal, György Hidas, Judith Dupont joined with American analysts; Stephen Mitchell, Bromberg, Shapiro, Therese Ragen, Arnold Rachman, Benjamin Wolstein, Jay Frankel, Christofer Fortune and William Brennan.
For me, it was an astonishing and life-changing introduction to Ferenczi and his work. I know Lew was technically my colleague in that venture but for me it was so new. I do think of him as also my guide into a new and amazing world. My image for that event is that it was like plate tectonics. Continents that were now far apart had once been joined. I knew my ancestors in psychoanalysis. I knew where object relations came from. Grandfather Ferenczi. Being part of that discovery with Lew was really wonderful, unexpected and surprising. Really so much of his work life and career had that effect and involvement.
In 2009, with Jeremy Safran, Lew Aron and I inaugurated the Sandor Ferenczi Center at The New School. Over a decade we developed programs, lectures, workshops devoted to Ferenczi’s model of interaction, elasticity of technique, trauma focused treatment and other psychoanalytic projects. We thought of this project as the site of ideals and projects at the heart of the historic mission of The New School and as a site for innovations in psychoanalysis along the lines of Ferenczi. It is shocking beyond measure that both my colleagues died within this past year. Miriam Steele has joined the center representing The New School faculty. We have enlarged the board and we go in remembering Lew and Jeremy and working within their vision. But it has been overwhelming to absorb both these losses. With regard to Lew, I/we are at the beginning.
There is a lot to remember and hold tight to as we register our loss of this amazing person. His career as a psychoanalytic educator, his director of institutions and so many structures: Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Div. 39, IARPP, and for over two decades, NYU Postdoc.
His career as a psychoanalytic educator, director of institutions and so many structures: Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Div 39, IARPP and others were handled with efficiency and grace. And of course there was his ability to take on so much of the continuation of Mitchell’s very premature death, through mentorship of students – local, national and international and an astonishing vocation as a teacher of psychoanalysis in a series of study groups which continued to meet right into January of this year.
Talk about playing well with others. He had fun. He was playful and funny, all the while accomplishing a stunning array of tasks, books, and creative endeavors.
We are all wishing that he could have had more time. There was more to do and more love to participate in. I think of the wonderful pleasure of Lew’s being with Galit’s children, Yali and Emma, at their bar and bat mitzvahs last summer and how much he helped with their preparation. And I know from my last visits with Lew that he was incredibly proud of how deeply his children Kiara, Raffi and Benjamin were participating in his care.
We hold him close as we say goodbye. We can only sit with such admiration and care for Galit Atlas who has held so much in these past years AND created with Lew a life of work and love.